Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy