Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs AMD Radeon R7 265

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Feb 2014
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy