Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD FirePro W4100

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
392 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy