Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
16384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Sep 2022
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
392 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
128
-
Shading Units
16384
4
TMUs
512
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
AD102
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy