Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Aug 2018
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
392 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
90 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy