Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD FirePro RG220

ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
80
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
M93
-
-
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy