Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs ATI FirePro V9800

ATI Radeon X1650 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1600
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy