Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD FireStream 9350

ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1440
4
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy