Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
16 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
31W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy