Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1650 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (9.600GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy