Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy