Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy