Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
100
-
Shading Units
12800
4
TMUs
400
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy