Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1792GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Dec 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
-
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

44W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
GT200B
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
R500
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy