Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA PG506 232

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
-
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

44W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
GA100
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
-
R500
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
N/A
2.1
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
3.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy