Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (44W vs 215W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
R600
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

44W
TDP
215W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy