Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1950 GT AGP and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (57W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
12
TMUs
256
12
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

57W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x Molex
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV570
GPU Name
Capsaicin
RV570 XL
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
R500
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy