Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1950 GT AGP and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (57W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
-
Shading Units
216
12
TMUs
72
12
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

57W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x Molex
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV570
GPU Name
GT200B
RV570 XL
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
R500
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy