Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
40 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 125W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1050 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
-
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

10.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
10.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

R580+
GPU Name
RV620
R580+ XT (215BAABKA31FG)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.384 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

125W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy