Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2020
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
490 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
12
TMUs
56
12
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

49W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x Molex
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R420
GPU Name
TU106
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
R400
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net