Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A780

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A780

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (2200MHz vs 2130MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Arc A780 +50%
18.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
2200 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
4096
88
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
88
Tensor Cores
512
22
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy