NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+39%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X2
8.602 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
4096
88
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
