Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (2130MHz vs 1147MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2%
12 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
555 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
80
2816
Shading Units
5120
88
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
128
88
Tensor Cores
640
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.0
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy