Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA A2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA A2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2130MHz vs 1770MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 200.1GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +164%
12 TFLOPS
A2
4.531 TFLOPS
VS
A2

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
10
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
1280
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
40
22
RT Cores
10
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

70W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy