Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro D300

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +451%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
2816
Shading Units
1280
88
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy