NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1854%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
May 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
