Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V8700

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +900%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
800
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
151W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy