NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 GE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2808 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+59900%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 9300 GE
0.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
1
2816
Shading Units
8
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
