Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2130MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +184%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Aug 2020
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
1280
88
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy