Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +13233%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
0.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
May 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
4
2816
Shading Units
32
88
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.60 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G96C
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy