NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 84W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+4445%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO
0.264 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
384MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
12
2816
Shading Units
96
88
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
12
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
84W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G92
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
