NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2130MHz vs 1468MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+964%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 1030
1.127 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+649%
8147
GeForce GT 1030
1087
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1981%
3601
GeForce GT 1030
173
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
May 2017
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1228 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
3
2816
Shading Units
384
88
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.49 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.23 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.62 GFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1127 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.23 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
GP108-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
