CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+4900%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
96
88
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
12
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
2
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
4
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
5
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
6
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
7
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
Related News
1
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
2
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
3
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
4
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
5
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
6
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
7
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
8
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
9
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
10
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy