Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +4900%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
12
2816
Shading Units
96
88
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
12
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy