NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 730 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+4360%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 730
0.269 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+2528%
8147
GeForce GT 730
310
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+3329%
3601
GeForce GT 730
105
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
2
2816
Shading Units
96
88
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
49W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
