NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1013%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
16
2816
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
48
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
