NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (2130MHz vs 2000MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+290%
12 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+151%
8147
Arc A350
3239
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+143%
3601
Arc A350
1481
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ada
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
768
88
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
88
Tensor Cores
96
22
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
