Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 83W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jul 2005
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
12
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
NV41
-
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
83W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy