NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 133.9GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 215W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1001%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition
1.089 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
837 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
133.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
14
2816
Shading Units
448
88
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
40
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.02 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.05 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1089 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
215W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
GT215-400-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
