NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2130MHz vs 1770MHz)

Lower TDP (70W vs 290W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

12 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB +81%

21.75 TFLOPS

Blender

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

2649

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB +54%

4092

OctaneBench

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

295

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB +34%

397

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

Graphics Card

Feb 2024

Release Date

Unknown

Quadro Ada

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz

Base Clock

1575 MHz

2130 MHz

Boost Clock

1770 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1188 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6X

128bit

Memory Bus

256bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

608.3GB/s

Render Config

-

22

SM Count

48

2816

Shading Units

6144

88

TMUs

192

48

ROPs

96

88

Tensor Cores

192

22

RT Cores

48

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

12 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

169.9 GPixel/s

187.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

339.8 GTexel/s

12.00 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

21.75 TFLOPS

12.00 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

21.75 TFLOPS

187.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

339.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W

TDP

290W

250 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

GA104

-

GPU Variant

GA104-401-A1

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

5 nm

Process Size

8 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

17.4 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

8.6

6.7

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1050

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 5550

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 7510 OEM

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S9150

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

Related News

1

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

2

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

3

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

4

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

5

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

6

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

7

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

8

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

9

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster

10

Preliminary Support for Intel Nova Lake in AIDA64: Identity Remains a Mystery