NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.19GB/s)
2480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1047%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 v2
1.046 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Sep 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
7
2816
Shading Units
336
88
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
24
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GF114
-
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
