Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +886%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
2816
Shading Units
640
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy