Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 510

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +3821%
12 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +5800%
295
NVS 510
5
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 2012
Quadro Ada
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
192
88
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy