Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 5630

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 5630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5630 's Advantages
Lower TDP (39W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2784%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5630
0.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.40 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
39W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood LE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy