CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
ATI Radeon HD 5850
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5850 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 151W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+474%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5850
2.088 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
Radeon HD 5850
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Sep 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
18
2816
Shading Units
1440
88
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.20 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.088 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO (215-0735043)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
151W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
4
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
6
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
7
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy