NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (2130MHz vs 2100MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
More VRAM (192GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
16640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+581%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
19456
88
TMUs
1216
48
ROPs
0
88
Tensor Cores
1216
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
153 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
