CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+26566%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
GeForce 205 OEM
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
16
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
6
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
7
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 3570
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM
Related News
1
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
2
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
3
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
4
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
5
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
6
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
7
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
8
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
9
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
10
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy