Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 70W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2006
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
NV43
-
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
110 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy