NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+109%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
2816
88
TMUs
176
48
ROPs
64
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Vesuvius
-
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
