Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +15337%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce 9650M GS
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2008
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
4
3072
Shading Units
32
96
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
29W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GS1-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy