Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM GeForce Go 6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2004
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce Go 6
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
12
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
160.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
10.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
160.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
NV41
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy